Simpatie Logo Simpatie: Safety Improvement for Patients in Europe Logo of the European Union




- Login

Table 36 'Postoperative Hip Fracture'

  • Please find a pdf-file of Table 36 here






  • PSI 35: Postoperative Hip Fracture
    Origin: Review of a common OECD/AHRQ/CIHI PSI (3;33)
    Dimension Description
    Description of Specific
    Aspects of Patient Safety
    Hip fracture can have devastating consequences including pain, loss of
    function and, sometimes, death. When hip fracture occurs in the postoperative
    period it can reflect inappropriate prescribing by medical
    staff (e.g., use of long-acting sedatives) or inadequate nursing
    procedures (e.g., lack of patient monitoring and bedrail use). Thus
    postoperative hip fracture is an adequate measure of patient safety.
    Aim of the PSI This PSI is intended to survey the incidence of postoperative hip
    fractures (as distinct from hip fractures occurring in non-surgical
    settings).
    Level of Determination of
    Patient Safety
    Safety is assessed at the aggregated patient level.
    Source(s) This indicator was originally proposed by Iezzoni et al.
    as part of the
    Complications Screening Program: CSP 25, “in-hospital hip fracture or
    fall”. The CSP definition also includes any documented fall, based on
    external cause of injury codes.
    The American Nurses Association, its State associations, and the
    California Nursing Outcomes Coalition have identified the number of
    patient falls leading to injury per 1000 patient days based on clinical
    data collection as a “nursing-sensitive quality indicator for acute care
    settings”(33).
    Extent of Clinically
    Testing
    The OECD Health Care Quality Indicators (HCQI) Project was
    initiated to implement quality measures for international
    benchmarking of medical care at the health system level. Five priority
    areas including patient safety were selected. International expert
    panels were formed to identify clinically important, scientifically
    sound, and feasible measures based on a structured consensus process.
    The consensus process lead to a recommendation of 86 indicators of
    which 21 covers aspects of patient safety (34).
    The project team developing the AHRQ PSI conducted extensive
    empirical analyses on this PSI. The team concluded that this PSI
    generally performs well on several different dimensions, including
    reliability, bias, relatedness of indicators, and persistence over time (3).
    The AHRQ PSI software was applied to Veteran Affairs (VA)
    administrative data to identify potential instances of compromised
    patient safety; determine occurrence rates of PSI events in the VA;
    and examine the construct validity of the PSIs. The study population
    was 97% male, with a mean age of 65 years, 54% were age 65 and
    SImPatIE WP4 – Catalogue of Patients Safety Indicators
    90
    older. All together 11411 PSI events were identified, 46% of PSI
    events occurred in surgical hospitalisation and 54% in medical
    hospitalisation. The observed PSI rate per 1000 discharges was 1.14
    for postoperative hip fracture. This PSI was not significantly
    associated with any other of the studied PSIs. Statistical significantly
    differences were found for hospitalisations with PSI events and those
    without PSI events for longer lengths of stay, mortality and higher
    costs (4).
    The performance of the AHRQ PSIs was analysed to: 1) provide a
    descriptive analysis of the incidence of PSI events from 2001 to 2004
    in the VA; 2) examine trends in national PSI rates at the hospital
    discharge level over time; and 3) assess whether hospital
    characteristics (teaching status, number of beds, and degree of quality
    improvement implementation) and baseline safety-related hospital
    performance predict future hospital safety-related performance. Riskadjusted
    rates of the PSI for iatrogenic pneumothorax and failure to
    rescue demonstrated a consistent rate over time. It was concluded, that
    the PSIs are useful tools for tracking and monitoring patient safety
    events. Future research should investigate whether trends reflect better
    or worse care or increased attention to documenting patient safety
    events (5).
    Administrative data from community hospitals in 16 US states with
    reliable race/ethnicity measures using the AHRQ PSIs was analysed to
    determine whether racial and ethnic differences in patient safety
    events disappear when income (a proxy for socioeconomic status) is
    taken into account. Postoperative hip fracture occurs significantly less
    often among other races than among white, possibility due to genetic
    differences. It was concluded that: ”The AHRQ PSIs are a broad
    screen for potential safety events that point to needed improvement in
    the quality of care for specific populations” (7).
    The results suggest that this PSI may be useful as a measure of patient
    safety (3-5;7;8;33;34).
    Evidence of Clinically use
    of Standards
    No evidence of clinically use of standards was found.
    PSI category Theme Related PSI: “In-Hospital Fall”
    Data definitions Cases of in-hospital hip fracture per 100 surgical discharges with an
    operating room procedure.
    Numerator Description Discharges with ICD-9-CM code for hip fracture in any secondary
    diagnosis field.
    Denominator Description All surgical discharges.
    Exclude cases:
    − Who have musculoskeletal and connective tissue diseases
    (MDC 8)
    − With principal diagnosis codes for seizure, syncope, stroke,
    coma, cardiac arrest, poisoning, trauma, delirium and other
    SImPatIE WP4 – Catalogue of Patients Safety Indicators
    91
    psychoses, or anoxic brain injury
    − With any diagnosis of metastatic cancer, lymphoid malignancy
    or bone malignancy, and self inflicted injury
    − 17 years of age and younger
    Data Source Administrative data.
    Identifying the
    institutional context
    As postoperative hip fractures can cause pain, suffering, prolonged
    hospital stays and additional surgical interventions, monitoring this PSI
    is important for pursuing quality improvement, economic, legal and
    ethical policies.
    Care Setting The PSI applies for high quality surgical care.
    Professionals Responsible
    for Health Care
    Surgeons.
    Lowest Level of Health
    Care Delivery Addressed
    Individual clinical units or departments.
    Allowance for Patient
    Factors
    Risk adjustment for age, sex, DRG, comorbidity categories.
    Stratification by
    Vulnerable Populations
    No stratification.
    Standard of Comparison No specific standards given.
    Scoring AHRQ has PSI software for scoring.