Simpatie Logo Simpatie: Safety Improvement for Patients in Europe Logo of the European Union




- Login

Table 16 'Complications of Anesthesia'

  • Please find a pdf-file of Table 16 here






  • PSI 15: Complications of Anesthesia
    Origin: Review of a common OECD/AHRQ/CIHI PSI (3;33)
    Dimension Description
    Description of Specific
    Aspects of Patient Safety
    Death due to anaesthesia has become rare, by contrast morbid events,
    i.e. complications related to anaesthetic care such as anaesthetic
    overdose, reaction, or endotrachial tube misplacement are much more
    prevalent causing harm to the patient to a different extend. Thus
    complications due to anesthesia are a relevant measure of patient
    safety.
    Aim of the PSI The PSI aims at surveillance of complications of anesthesia.
    Level of Determination of
    Patient Safety
    Safety is assessed at the aggregated patient level.
    Source(s)
    A subset of this AHRQ indicator was originally proposed by Iezzoni et
    al. as part of Complications Screening Program (CSP) (CSP 21,
    “Complications relating to anesthetic agents and other CNS
    depressants”). The CPS definition also included poisoning due to
    centrally acting muscle relaxants and accidental poisoning by nitrogen
    oxides, which are omitted from this AHRQ PSI. The CPS definition
    excludes other codes included in this PSI, namely, poisoning by other
    and unspecified general anesthetics and external cause of injury codes
    for “endotracheal tube wrongly place during anesthetic procedure” and
    adverse effects of anesthetics in therapeutic use.
    Organisations responding to the same indicator theme are Australian
    Incident Monitoring System and the National Patient Safety Agency in
    the UK (3;33)
    Extent of Clinically
    Testing
    The OECD Health Care Quality Indicators (HCQI) Project was
    initiated to implement quality measures for international
    benchmarking of medical care at the health system level. Five priority
    areas including patient safety were selected. International expert
    panels were formed to identify clinically important, scientifically
    sound, and feasible measures based on a structured consensus process.
    The consensus process lead to a recommendation of 86 indicators of
    which 21 covers aspects of patient safety (34).
    The project team developing the AHRQ PSI conducted extensive
    empirical analyses on this PSI. The team concluded that this PSI
    generally performs well on several different dimensions, including
    reliability, bias, relatedness of indicators, and persistence over time.
    The literature review of the AHRQ project team focused on the
    validity of complication indicators based on ICD-9-CM diagnosis or
    SImPatIE WP4 – Catalogue of Patients Safety Indicators
    41
    procedure codes. Results of the literature review indicate no published
    evidence for the sensitivity or predictive value of this indicator based
    on detailed chart review or prospective data collection (3).
    The AHRQ PSI software was applied to Veteran Affairs (VA)
    administrative data to identify potential instances of compromised
    patient safety; determine occurrence rates of PSI events in the VA;
    and examine the construct validity of the PSIs. The study population
    was 97% male, with a mean age of 65 years, 54% were age 65 and
    older. All together 11411 PSI events were identified, 46% of PSI
    events occurred in surgical hospitalisation and 54% in medical
    hospitalisation. The observed PSI rate per 1000 discharges was 0.56
    for complications of anesthesia. This PSI was significantly associated
    with the AHRQ PSI for “Technical Difficulty with Procedure”. No
    significant differences were found for hospitalisations with PSI events
    and those without PSI events for longer lengths of stay, higher
    mortality, and higher costs (4).
    The performance of the AHRQ PSIs was analysed to: 1) provide a
    descriptive analysis of the incidence of PSI events from 2001 to 2004
    in the VA; 2) examine trends in national PSI rates at the hospital
    discharge level over time; and 3) assess whether hospital
    characteristics (teaching status, number of beds, and degree of quality
    improvement implementation) and baseline safety-related hospital
    performance predict future hospital safety-related performance. Riskadjusted
    rates of the PSI for iatrogenic pneumothorax and failure to
    rescue demonstrated a consistent rate over time. After accounting for
    patient and hospital characteristics, hospitals' baseline risk-adjusted PSI
    rates were the most important predictors of the 2004 risk-adjusted rates
    for eight PSIs (decubitus ulcer, failure to rescue, iatrogenic
    pneumothorax, infection resulting from medical care, postoperative
    hemorrhage or hematoma, postoperative respiratory failure,
    postoperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis and
    accidental puncture/laceration). It was concluded, that the PSIs are
    useful tools for tracking and monitoring patient safety events. Future
    research should investigate whether trends reflect better or worse care
    or increased attention to documenting patient safety events (5).
    Administrative data from community hospitals in 16 US states with
    reliable race/ethnicity measures using the AHRQ PSIs was analysed to
    determine whether racial and ethnic differences in patient safety
    events disappear when income (a proxy for socioeconomic status) is
    taken into account. Complications of anesthesia occur significantly
    more often among black and Hispanic people than among white. It
    was concluded that: ”The AHRQ PSIs are a broad screen for potential
    safety events that point to needed improvement in the quality of care
    for specific populations” (7).
    AHRQ is determining the feasibility and practicality in a project
    concerning validation of selected AHRQ Quality Indicators (8).
    The results suggest that this PSI may be useful as a measure of patient
    safety (3-5;7;8;33;34).
    SImPatIE WP4 – Catalogue of Patients Safety Indicators
    42
    Evidence of Clinically use
    of Standards
    No evidence of clinically use of standards was found.
    PSI category Theme Related PSI: “Surgical Complication”.
    Data definitions Cases of anesthetic overdose, reaction, or endotrachial tube
    misplacement per 1000 surgery discharges with an operating room
    procedure.
    Numerator Description Discharges with ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes for anesthesia
    complications in any secondary diagnosis field.
    Denominator Description All surgical discharges, 18 years and older or MDC 14 (pregnancy,
    childbirth, and puerperium), defined by specific DRGs and an ICD-9-
    CM code for an operating room procedure.
    Exclude cases with:
    − ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes for anesthesia complications in the
    principal diagnosis field
    − codes for self-inflicted injury, poisoning due to anesthetics
    (E8551, 9681-4, 9687) and any diagnosis code for active drug
    dependence, or active non-dependent abuse of drugs.
    Data Source Administrative data. Ideally, this PSI is used with a coding designation
    that distinguishes conditions present on admission from those that
    develop in-hospital.
    Identifying the
    institutional context
    This PSI is relevant to quality improvement, accreditation and cost
    containment, as complications due to anesthetic overdose, reaction, or
    endotrachial tube misplacement can have considerable economic
    impact.
    Care Setting The PSI applies for high quality anaesthesia care.
    Professionals Responsible
    for Health Care
    Anaesthesiologists.
    Lowest Level of Health
    Care Delivery Addressed
    Individual clinical units or departments.
    Allowance for Patient
    Factors
    Risk adjustment for age, sex, DRG, comorbidity categories.
    Stratification by
    Vulnerable Populations
    No stratification.
    Standard of Comparison No specific standards given. Hospital-wide surveillance.
    Scoring AHRQ has PSI software for scoring.