Simpatie Logo Simpatie: Safety Improvement for Patients in Europe Logo of the European Union




- Login

Table 6 'Transition of Care - Patient's Understanding of the Purpose of their Medication'

  • Please find a pdf-file of Table 6 here






  • PSI 6: Transition of Care – Patient’s Understanding of their Medication
    Origin: PSI by SimPatIE
    Dimension Description
    Description of Specific
    Aspects of Patient Safety
    Communication and transfer of information between healthcare
    settings and between professionals and patients are essential
    aspects of patient safety. Especially care transition processes are
    known to be vulnerable regarding patient safety. Understanding
    the purpose of the medication can impact compliance. Adherence
    to medications is important as lack of compliance can have fatal
    consequences for the patient.
    Aim of the PSI This PSI aims at highlighting the quality of staff patient
    communication regarding patients understanding of the purpose of
    their medication when leaving hospital.
    Level of Determination of
    Patient Safety
    Safety is assessed at the aggregate patient level.
    Source(s) This PSI is derived from the “Care Transitions Measure” question
    3. Please see www.caretransitions.org
    Dr. Coleman and colleagues have designed a measure to assess
    the quality of care transitions: the Care Transitions Measure
    (CTM ©). The CTM exists in two forms a 15-item unidimensional
    version and a three-item version (CTM-3), which is a
    subset of the 15 items version. The primary objective of the
    development of CTM was a measure that is both substantively and
    methodologically consistent with the concept of patientcenteredness,
    and useful for the purpose of performance
    measurement and subsequent public reporting. CTM assesses
    health care professionals accomplished essential care processes
    (14).
    Extent of Clinically Testing CTM is used in 15 different countries.
    Specific CTM items were developed; pilot tested, and refined
    using focus groups. By standard qualitative analytic techniques
    applied to the written interview transcripts, four key domains were
    found for the CTM. The domains were: 1) information transfer; 2)
    patient and caregiver preparation; 3) self-management support;
    and 4) empowerment to assert preferences. Psychometric testing
    of the CTM included content and construct validity, intra-item
    variation, and floor/ceiling properties. High internal consistency
    and reliability were found. Also applicability for assessment
    across multiple sites of care: hospital to home, hospital to skilled
    nursing facility, skilled nursing facility to home was good. CTM
    demonstrated power to discriminate between: 1) patients
    discharged from hospital that did/did not experience a subsequent
    emergency visit or readmission for their index condition, and 2)
    SImPatIE WP4 – Catalogue of Patients Safety Indicators
    17
    health care facilities with differing levels of commitment to care
    coordination. The researchers concluded: “CTM may serve to fill
    an important gap in health system performance evaluation by
    measuring the quality of care delivered across settings” (14).
    The developer of TCM-3 have studied the differential item
    function by gender, self rated health, age, educational level and
    ethnicity. It was found that these variables do not bias the
    responses on TCM-3. No risk adjustment was found necessary
    (15-17)
    Specifications are given for the use of CTM-3 in five domains: 1)
    Survey Instrument, 2) Sampling, 3) Survey administration 4)
    Scoring and patient mix adjustment and 5) Reporting data (15).
    Dr. Coleman and his colleagues also developed a 4-week Care
    Transition Intervention program, which was tested in a
    randomised controlled trial. Patients with complex care needs
    received either treatment as usual or the CTM-intervention:
    specific tools, support by a “Transition Coach,” and selfmanagement
    skills. Patients in the CTM-program were
    significantly less likely to be readmitted and they were more
    likely to achieve self-identified personal goals around symptom
    management and functional recovery. Findings were sustained for
    as long as six months after the program ended (18).
    Evidence of Clinically use of
    Standards
    No evidence of clinically use of standards was found.
    PSI category Institution-Wide PSI.
    Data definitions Patient’s agreement that they understand the purpose for taking
    their medicine measured on a 5-point Likert scale per 100
    discharges.
    Numerator Description Number of patients agreeing that they understand the purpose of
    taking their medication rated as “Agree” or “Strongly agree”
    measured on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “Strongly
    Disagree”, “Disagree”, “Don’t know/Don’t remember/Not
    applicable” to “Agree” and “Strongly Agree”.
    Denominator Description Number of discharges from acute care hospitals.
    Exclude:
    - Psychiatric patients/ Patients with cognitive disorders
    - Paediatric patients under age 18 years
    - Patients who die in hospital
    - Patients who did not stay at least one night in hospital
    - Other patients as required by law or regulation in the state
    in which the hospital operates
    Data Source The Care Transitions Measure (CTM-3) Question 3.
    Identifying the institutional
    context
    The impact of high quality communication and information makes
    this PSI important in safety improvement policies.
    SImPatIE WP4 – Catalogue of Patients Safety Indicators
    18
    Care Setting The PSI applies institution-wide.
    Professionals Responsible for
    Health Care
    All authorised health care workers.
    Lowest Level of Health Care
    Delivery Addressed
    Individual clinical department.
    Allowance for Patient
    Factors
    No risk adjustment described.
    Stratification by Vulnerable
    Populations
    No stratification.
    Standard of Comparison Yearly. Please see (15).
    Scoring Scores are obtained and scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging
    from “Strongly Disagree”, “Disagree”, “Don’t know/Don’t
    remember/Not applicable” to “Agree” and “Strongly Agree”.
    Scores of “Agree” and “Strongly Agree”. Scores are cumulated
    and frequencies calculated. Specifications are given for the use of
    CTM-3 in five domains: 1) Survey Instrument, 2) Sampling, 3)
    Survey administration 4) Scoring and patient mix adjustment and
    5) Reporting data (15).